<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML File Pattern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.extjs.eu/patterns/file-patters/html-file-pattern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.extjs.eu/patterns/file-patters/html-file-pattern/</link>
	<description>For good of all productive developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:40:38 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thezver</title>
		<link>http://blog.extjs.eu/patterns/file-patters/html-file-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-3691</link>
		<dc:creator>thezver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.extjs.eu/?p=7#comment-3691</guid>
		<description>I include scripts inside the body.  browsers will load them much faster , and the same time will already show background/ whatever. it\&#039;s because some simultaneous-loading limitations for the scripts in header.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I include scripts inside the body.  browsers will load them much faster , and the same time will already show background/ whatever. it\&#8217;s because some simultaneous-loading limitations for the scripts in header.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.extjs.eu/patterns/file-patters/html-file-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-3677</link>
		<dc:creator>Denilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.extjs.eu/?p=7#comment-3677</guid>
		<description>Is there any real reason to not have a DOCTYPE nowadays? This info is from 2008, we are in 2010, is it still valid?

This warning is also written here:
http://www.extjs.com/learn/Tutorial:Application_Layout_for_Beginners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any real reason to not have a DOCTYPE nowadays? This info is from 2008, we are in 2010, is it still valid?</p>
<p>This warning is also written here:<br />
<a href="http://www.extjs.com/learn/Tutorial:Application_Layout_for_Beginners" rel="nofollow">http://www.extjs.com/learn/Tutorial:Application_Layout_for_Beginners</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsakalos</title>
		<link>http://blog.extjs.eu/patterns/file-patters/html-file-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>jsakalos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.extjs.eu/?p=7#comment-19</guid>
		<description>vim modeline is not exactly at the beginning of the file so ~/.vimrc should contain entry:

&lt;pre&gt;
set modeline
set modelines=5 &quot; or more
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vim modeline is not exactly at the beginning of the file so ~/.vimrc should contain entry:</p>
<pre>
set modeline
set modelines=5 " or more
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsakalos</title>
		<link>http://blog.extjs.eu/patterns/file-patters/html-file-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>jsakalos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.extjs.eu/?p=7#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I have added doctype to this template. If you encounter some strange rendering issues in Internet Explorer, one of the first steps is to remove the doctype and let IE run in quirks mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have added doctype to this template. If you encounter some strange rendering issues in Internet Explorer, one of the first steps is to remove the doctype and let IE run in quirks mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
